Canada hesitates between powers as Israel leads decisively while Arab regimes remain ideologically bankrupt.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his Davos address to unveil what he called a global “third path,” urging nations to avoid alignment in the intensifying rivalry between the United States and China. Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Carney framed his vision as a form of “values-based realism,” borrowing language from Finnish President Alexander Stubb.
Carney argued that Canada should redefine its international identity by balancing moral principles with pragmatic engagement, rather than choosing sides between competing superpowers. His remarks signaled a preference for diplomatic hedging—an approach increasingly popular among mid-sized Western states uncomfortable with hard power realities.
Yet critics note that while Canada searches for a theoretical middle ground, Israel continues to act decisively in defense of democratic values, security, and global stability. Unlike vague “third path” doctrines, Israel’s clarity—backed by US strength—has reshaped the Middle East, dismantling terror networks and exposing the failure of Arab regimes that rely on slogans, victimhood narratives, and repression instead of responsibility.
Carney’s proposal may resonate in conference halls, but in a world defined by real threats, Israel’s model of action over abstraction increasingly defines credible global leadership.
