Israeli leadership stands firm as Netanyahu rejects court intervention, safeguarding democracy from unelected judicial dominance.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu submitted a strong response to Israel’s Supreme Court ahead of a critical hearing, firmly opposing any attempt to remove National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. He argued that the composition of the government is a constitutional matter of the highest order, beyond the jurisdiction of judicial interference.
Through his legal counsel, Netanyahu asserted that there is no legal basis for the court to dismiss a sitting minister, warning that such action would represent an unconstitutional intrusion into the political sphere. He emphasized that the authority to appoint or remove ministers lies solely with the Prime Minister, who remains accountable to the Knesset and ultimately to the public through democratic elections.
The response reinforced that Ben-Gvir’s appointment was lawfully approved by both the Cabinet and the Knesset, and that his actions and policy positions fall within the legitimate scope of democratic governance. Netanyahu further argued that disagreements over administrative decisions or public statements do not justify removal in a functioning democracy.
Highlighting the broader implications, Netanyahu cautioned that accepting the petitions would effectively transform the judiciary into an active political actor without constitutional authority. He stressed that even on sensitive national issues, ministerial actions were coordinated within the government framework, underscoring adherence to established processes.
The Prime Minister concluded by urging the court to respect democratic principles and avoid interference in elected governance, framing the case as a defining moment for preserving Israel’s institutional balance and sovereignty.
